daily californian logo

BERKELEY'S NEWS • JUNE 03, 2023

Apply to The Daily Californian!

CA lawmakers must pass SB 232, strengthen social safety net

article image

JERICHO TANG | STAFF

SUPPORT OUR NONPROFIT NEWSROOM

We're an independent student-run newspaper, and need your support to maintain our coverage.

MAY 27, 2021

Congressional interns across the state are fielding calls and emails from community members. While some of these calls come from fervent political activists and ranting QAnon believers,  innumerable constituents phone in with one concern: unemployment checks.

The Employment Development Department, or EDD, cracked under the pressure after millions of Californians lost their jobs in the pandemic. People are spending hours on hold with the department, only for their calls to land in voicemail. 

California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s latest budget proposal — set to be approved mid-June — aims to bail out EDD and provide relief for Californians. The proposed budget will siphon a one-time $276.3 million to EDD to pay for contractors to sift through an astronomical number of claims. The additional resources should allow 3.5 years’ worth of work to be completed in 12 months. But with many still facing financial challenges, time is rapidly running out. For the sake of desperate Californians, Newsom’s administration must act with urgency.

Imagine if 2.7 million Californians flooded the Department of Motor Vehicles to renew their driver’s licenses in a single day. We can all envision the hypothetical chaos — the DMV, like many government institutions, is woefully unprepared for such a spike in demand. 

This is the scenario that EDD found itself in, and the stakes are much higher than expired driver’s licenses. Millions of livelihoods now hinge on a floundering bureaucracy. Earlier this month, more than 1 million unemployment claims had yet to be fully addressed. 

While Newsom’s proposed budget allocations may provide short-term relief, the pandemic has revealed EDD’s dire need for drastic overhaul. That’s where Senate Bill 232 comes into play.

SB 232, currently under deliberation in the California Legislature, aims to create changes in EDD that will last long after the funds from Newsom dry up. SB 232 will require the department to create model workload projections that account for sudden increases in unemployment and establish a system for tracking and analyzing claims. The bill also stipulates that EDD must develop a recession plan based on previous economic downturns, including the COVID-19 pandemic. 

SB 232 must be passed. Newsom’s proposed budget allocations might offer lawmakers a false sense of comfort, but without the substantial changes denoted in SB 232, EDD will likely still be susceptible to backlog and fraud.

As we approach the middle of the 21st century, Californians will face increasingly unpredictable weather patterns, chronic drought and a shifting global economic order. We can no longer afford a social safety net that tears under the weight of its citizens. When COVID-19 put millions of Californians out of work, EDD was unable to rise to the challenge. Our institutions must be prepared for future crises. When the next global catastrophe rocks California to its core, SB 232 might give EDD a fighting chance.

Editorials represent the majority opinion of the editorial board as written by the summer 2021 opinion editor, Sarah Siegel.
LAST UPDATED

MAY 27, 2021


Related Articles

featured article
The pandemic has introduced a degree of uncertainty into almost everybody’s life, but UC lecturers have been living under uncertainty for far too long.
The pandemic has introduced a degree of uncertainty into almost everybody’s life, but UC lecturers have been living under uncertainty for far too long.
featured article
featured article
Despite receiving a majority “yes” vote, the STF fee referendum failed, falling 0.9% short of a campus quorum requirement of 20%. Now, students are losing access to technology infrastructure, valuable software and tech equity programs.
Despite receiving a majority “yes” vote, the STF fee referendum failed, falling 0.9% short of a campus quorum requirement of 20%. Now, students are losing access to technology infrastructure, valuable software and tech equity programs.
featured article
featured article
While the UC system is only one proponent of the project, revoking its support would be a resounding statement of principle and demonstration of solidarity.
While the UC system is only one proponent of the project, revoking its support would be a resounding statement of principle and demonstration of solidarity.
featured article