daily californian logo

BERKELEY'S NEWS • MAY 25, 2023

Apply to The Daily Californian!

After Supreme Court win, Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy still faces challenges, experts say

article image

DANIEL KIM | FILE

In a virtual discussion of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, program, panelists covered the significance of upcoming elections, Supreme Court decisions and the Black Lives Matter movement in relation to both DACA and undocumented immigrants.

SUPPORT OUR NONPROFIT NEWSROOM

We're an independent student-run newspaper, and need your support to maintain our coverage.

SEPTEMBER 10, 2020

Panelists discussed the current state of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, policy and some of its limitations in a Thursday virtual event presented by UC Berkeley’s Institute of Governmental Studies, or IGS.

The event was moderated by IGS co-director Cristina Mora and featured faculty in related fields from other universities. They covered the significance of upcoming elections, Supreme Court decisions and the Black Lives Matter movement in relation to both DACA and undocumented immigrants.

In 2017, President Donald Trump’s administration announced it would be phasing out the DACA program, which former president Barack Obama’s administration established in 2012. The Supreme Court, however, overturned that decision in June, according to Mora.

“Many dreamers and DACA holders were thus able to breathe a collective sigh of relief, but the legal landscape for them remains still very much uncertain,” Mora said during the event.

UCLA School of Law professor Jennifer Chacón said since the Supreme Court’s ruling, members of the Trump administration have challenged the decision. She added that U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services announced it will not be accepting new DACA applicants and will require DACA recipients to renew their status more frequently.

While the panelists acknowledged that the upcoming presidential election could be important in determining the future of DACA, they also encouraged people to pay attention to other tiers of the government.

“It matters who’s president, but it also matters who’s in Congress and whether you can get a bill passed,” Chacón said during the event. “It matters, then, for implementation and protection and policing, who your district attorney is and who your governor is and who the state legislators are and who your city council members are.”

Associate professor at Cornell University’s Industrial and Labor Relations School Shannon Gleeson said local governments are important when it comes to enforcing DACA and providing resources because the program does not come with federal funding.

The panelists also pointed out that not all undocumented immigrants are eligible to apply for DACA.

“Part of this puzzle is actually understanding where the gaps are within the undocumented student population,” said Laura Enriquez, assistant professor in Chicano/Latino studies at UC Irvine, during the event. “What’s different between students that have DACA and those that don’t, and how different are they from, you know, our other student populations?”

A survey of students with immigrant parents conducted in the spring through the UC Collaborative to Promote Immigrant and Student Equity found that there were differences between students of legally immigrated parents and undocumented students in terms of GPA and anxiety levels, Enriquez said. There were not always differences in anxiety levels, however, between DACA students and those with no legal status.

Enriquez suggested considering DACA’s limitations as well as ways to support undocumented students both with and without DACA.

“There’s a lot of conversation about DACA, and that leaves out the students, the large group of students that don’t have that,” Enriquez said at the event. “I think moving forward it’s really important to think about the diversity of experiences around DACA.”

Contact Emma Rooholfada at [email protected] and follow her on Twitter at @erooholfada_dc.
LAST UPDATED

SEPTEMBER 10, 2020


Related Articles

featured article
UC Berkeley School of Law professor John Yoo has been consulting the White House on a political theory that allows a sitting president to impose policies without congressional approval.
UC Berkeley School of Law professor John Yoo has been consulting the White House on a political theory that allows a sitting president to impose policies without congressional approval.
featured article
featured article
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of the UC Board of Regents on Thursday, finding that President Donald Trump’s decision to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, program was “arbitrary.”
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of the UC Board of Regents on Thursday, finding that President Donald Trump’s decision to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, program was “arbitrary.”
featured article
featured article
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Thursday in favor of the UC system and upheld protections for people with Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals status. 
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Thursday in favor of the UC system and upheld protections for people with Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals status. 
featured article