daily californian logo

BERKELEY'S NEWS • SEPTEMBER 23, 2023

Apply to The Daily Californian by September 8th!

CA Assembly members propose amendment to allow affirmative action

article image

WIKIMEDIA | CREATIVE COMMONS

SUPPORT OUR NONPROFIT NEWSROOM

We're an independent student-run newspaper, and need your support to maintain our coverage.

MARCH 15, 2020

A state constitutional amendment that would repeal Proposition 209, California’s ban on affirmative action, was proposed in a state Assembly meeting March 9.

Prop. 209, which was approved in 1996, bans state public institutions from discriminating on the basis of race, sex or ethnicity. This effectively disallows affirmative action — policies favoring groups that have historically suffered from discrimination. The amendment, ACA 5, which was primarily authored by Assemblymembers Shirley Weber and Mike Gipson, would allow for race and gender to be considered in hiring and college admissions. If successful, the amendment would eventually appear on the ballot for the consideration of California voters.

“Proposition 209 has cost women- and minority-owned businesses $1.1 billion each year,” Weber said in a press release. “It has perpetuated a wage gap wherein women make 80 cents on every dollar made by men and has allowed discriminatory hiring and contracting processes to continue unhindered.”

According to the amendment’s text, the repeal of Prop. 209 aims to “transcend a legacy of unequal treatment of marginalized groups” and give members of marginalized groups equal opportunities for upward mobility and pay equity.

Multiple previous attempts to reinstitute affirmative action in California have failed. In 2011, a state Senate bill that would have allowed for affirmative action passed both legislative houses but was vetoed by then-California governor Jerry Brown.

A proposed constitutional amendment in 2014, which would have similarly repealed Prop. 209, failed in the legislature.

“Prop. 209 has directly resulted in disproportionately low representation of Black, Latinx, Native, and underrepresented API people within our student body,” said ASUC External Affairs Vice President Varsha Sarveshwar in an email. “It has been, quite frankly, a catastrophe for diversity, equity, and inclusion. Repealing it – and implementing affirmative action policies – is imperative if our student body is to reflect California’s population and mitigate our severe campus climate issues.”

Natalie Gott contributed to this report.

Alexandra Feldman is the lead academics and administration reporter. Contact her at [email protected] and follow her on Twitter at @a_p_feldman.
LAST UPDATED

MARCH 16, 2020


Related Articles

featured article
The Berkeley Forum hosted an affirmative action debate March 5, where participants argued about controversial aspects of race-based admissions.
The Berkeley Forum hosted an affirmative action debate March 5, where participants argued about controversial aspects of race-based admissions.
featured article
featured article
A campus climate hearing held Tuesday by the ASUC External Affairs Vice President’s office and assemblymember Shirley Weber, D-San Diego, addressed issues regarding the Black student experience throughout the UC system.
A campus climate hearing held Tuesday by the ASUC External Affairs Vice President’s office and assemblymember Shirley Weber, D-San Diego, addressed issues regarding the Black student experience throughout the UC system.
featured article
featured article
Laws intended to address issues brought to public attention in the 2019 college admissions bribery scandal are going into effect this year.
Laws intended to address issues brought to public attention in the 2019 college admissions bribery scandal are going into effect this year.
featured article