daily californian logo

BERKELEY'S NEWS • SEPTEMBER 30, 2023

Apply to The Daily Californian by September 8th!

Supreme Court rules on Berkeley resident's suit against Austrian company

article image

SUPPORT OUR NONPROFIT NEWSROOM

We're an independent student-run newspaper, and need your support to maintain our coverage.

DECEMBER 02, 2015

In its first decision of its new term, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that a Berkeley resident could not sue a foreign state-owned company in U.S. court over an incident that occurred outside the United States.

Ruling against Carol Sachs, who was injured while attempting to board a train in Austria in 2007, the Court said that Sachs’ purchase of a Eurail ticket online from a Massachusetts company while in the United States was not sufficient to warrant a suit in U.S. court.

Sachs lost her legs after she tried to board a train in Innsbruck, Austria, and fell from the platform while the train was moving. She blamed the incident on an unsafe boarding platform and tried to sue the Austrian state-owned railroad company, OBB Personenverkehr, in federal court in California, arguing that when she bought her Eurail pass online from the Rail Pass Experts, based in Massachusetts, she was dealing with an agent of the Austrian company.

The district judge in San Francisco dismissed her suit on the grounds that the commercial activity of buying a Eurail pass was not responsible for her accident, but the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals overruled the dismissal in an 8-3 decision.

The Court of Appeals cited the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, which shields foreign states and their agencies from from lawsuits in U.S. courts, except in special circumstances, such as when commercial activity involving foreign states occurs in the United States. Sachs claimed that buying the ticket online from the Rail Pass Experts constituted such commercial activity.

OBB appealed to the Supreme Court, which heard the case. The court disagreed with Sachs and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, arguing in line with the San Francisco district judge’s initial ruling that because the commercial activity was not responsible for the incident occurring, the commercial activity exception should not apply.

“However Sachs frames her suit, the incident in Innsbruck, Austria, remains at its foundation,” wrote Chief Justice John Roberts on behalf of the unanimous court.

Contact Maxwell Jenkins-Goetz at [email protected].
LAST UPDATED

DECEMBER 02, 2015


Related Articles

featured article
The California Supreme Court released a ruling Monday that sets a legal precedent for California cities and counties to adopt inclusionary housing policies.
The California Supreme Court released a ruling Monday that sets a legal precedent for California cities and counties to adopt inclusionary housing policies.
featured article
After years of litigation between the city and a local preservationist group, a Monday California Supreme Court ruling ordered further examination of a local entrepreneur’s plans to building a new home in the Berkeley Hills
After years of litigation between the city and a local preservationist group, a Monday California Supreme Court ruling ordered further examination of a local entrepreneur’s plans to building a new home in the Berkeley Hills
featured article
A judge ruled Friday that Berkeley Patients Group, a well-known marijuana dispensary, will be allowed to continue its operations while an appeal regarding a federal case against the dispensary is settled.
A judge ruled Friday that Berkeley Patients Group, a well-known marijuana dispensary, will be allowed to continue its operations while an appeal regarding a federal case against the dispensary is settled.
featured article